Model comparison
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Llama 2-13B
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 31.1.
- Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Llama 2-13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 49.5 | 29.6 |
| Released | 2026-10-07 | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1587 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1062 |
Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 65.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1051 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 30% | — |
| DTBench | — | 42.2% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 58.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 106.17 |
| HellaSwag | — | 80.7% |
| LAMBADA | — | 76.5% |
| PIQA | — | 80.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.8% |
Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 75.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1065 |
| GSM8K | — | 36.9% |
Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 23.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1030 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.4% |
| MMLU | — | 55.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 57% |
| TriviaQA | — | 79.6% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Llama 2-13B: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 47.5% | — |
| ScienceQA | — | 55.8% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1024 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1001 |
| LMArena French | — | 1044 |
| LMArena German | — | 1009 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 894 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 953 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1055 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1087 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1045 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1064 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1084 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1047 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1050 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Llama 2-13B?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Llama 2-13B better for coding?
Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Llama 2-13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.