Model comparison
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemma 2B
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 30.0.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 2B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 49.5 | 29.6 |
| Released | 2026-10-07 | 2024-02-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1587 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1010 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 20.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 34.1% |
Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 65.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 989 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 30% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 35.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 94.2 |
| HellaSwag | — | 71.4% |
| PIQA | — | 77.3% |
| WinoGrande | — | 65.4% |
Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 75.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1009 |
| GSM8K | — | 17.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Gemma 2B: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 23.8% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 42.1% |
| BoolQ | — | 69.4% |
| MMLU | — | 42.3% |
| TriviaQA | — | 53.2% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Gemma 2B: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 47.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 958 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 986 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 937 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 970 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 981 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1002 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 987 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 945 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Gemma 2B?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Gemma 2B better for coding?
Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemma 2B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2B has 23.