Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Wizardlm 70b

Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic

39.3

Rank #155 Confirmed

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

32.4

Rank #245 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude Haiku 4.5 leads 58.1 to 34.9.
  • Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 4.5Wizardlm 70b
ProviderAnthropicMicrosoft
Noometry Index39.332.4
Released2025-10-15—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output64K—
Input $ / M tokens$1—
Output $ / M tokens$5—
Results tracked5312

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 43.9 (#71), Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding14541081
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)66.6%—
LMArena WebDev1330—
SWE-bench Multilingual64.7%—
SciCode43.3%—
WeirdML45.4%—
ALE-Bench653.48—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Haiku 4.5: 33.5 (#50), Wizardlm 70b: —

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Wizardlm 70b
Terminal-Bench35.5%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard68.7%—
DeepResearch Bench45.5%—
BALROG31.2%—
ExploitBench13.7%—
Vending-Bench 2458.89—

Reasoning Wizardlm 70b leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 15.1 (#310), Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts14201079
ARC-AGI-24%—
NYT Connections (extended)14.3%—
ARC-AGI-147.7%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles8%—
DTBench73.6%—
LMCA30.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.42—
ForecastBench61.4—

Math Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 43.0 (#69), Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Math13951116
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202566.7%—
Omni-MATH56.1%—
MATH Level 596.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)5.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Haiku 4.5: 37.6 (#146), Wizardlm 70b: —

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Wizardlm 70b
GPQA Diamond71.2%—
SimpleQA Verified13.2%—
MMLU-Pro77.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.8%—
GPQA (HELM)60.5%—
LMArena Expert1443—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Haiku 4.5: 27.0 (#111), Wizardlm 70b: —

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Wizardlm 70b
Blueprint-Bench 20%—
LMArena Document1420—

Multilingual Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 50.1 (#124), Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English13761078
LMArena Chinese14151052
LMArena German13771083
LMArena Russian13801155
LMArena French1408—
LMArena Japanese1339—
LMArena Korean1346—
LMArena Spanish1420—

Instruction Following Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 71.6 (#144), Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following14141093
IFEval80.1%—

Long Context Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 43.6 (#86), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query14271097

Writing & Preference Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 58.1 (#119), Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Text13961120
LMArena Creative Writing13711149
LMArena Multi-Turn14091108
WildBench83.9%—
EQ-Bench 41064—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Wizardlm 70b?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 4.5 has 53 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper