Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Wizardlm 13b

Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic

39.5

Rank #165 Confirmed

Wizardlm 13b Microsoft

31.4

Rank #274 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude Haiku 4.5 leads 57.9 to 30.5.
  • Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 4.5Wizardlm 13b
ProviderAnthropicMicrosoft
Noometry Index39.531.4
Released2025-10-15—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output64K—
Input $ / M tokens$1—
Output $ / M tokens$5—
Results tracked5310

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 44.0 (#78), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Coding14531035
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)66.6%—
LMArena WebDev1330—
SWE-bench Multilingual64.7%—
SciCode43.3%—
WeirdML45.4%—
ALE-Bench653.48—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Haiku 4.5: 33.6 (#52), Wizardlm 13b: —

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Wizardlm 13b
Terminal-Bench35.5%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard68.7%—
DeepResearch Bench45.5%—
BALROG31.2%—
ExploitBench13.7%—
Vending-Bench 2458.89—

Reasoning Wizardlm 13b leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 15.1 (#320), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts14201018
ARC-AGI-24%—
NYT Connections (extended)14.3%—
ARC-AGI-147.7%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles8%—
DTBench73.6%—
LMCA30.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.41—
ForecastBench61.4—

Math Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 44.9 (#78), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Math13961017
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202566.7%—
Omni-MATH56.1%—
MATH Level 596.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)5.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Haiku 4.5: 37.7 (#153), Wizardlm 13b: —

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Wizardlm 13b
GPQA Diamond71.2%—
SimpleQA Verified13.2%—
MMLU-Pro77.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.8%—
GPQA (HELM)60.5%—
LMArena Expert1442—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Haiku 4.5: 26.8 (#118), Wizardlm 13b: —

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Wizardlm 13b
Blueprint-Bench 20%—
LMArena Document1420—

Multilingual Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 49.9 (#129), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Non-English13771034
LMArena Chinese14171023
LMArena French1408—
LMArena German1375—
LMArena Japanese1339—
LMArena Korean1347—
LMArena Russian1381—
LMArena Spanish1420—

Instruction Following Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 71.4 (#149), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Instruction Following14141048
IFEval80.1%—

Long Context Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 43.6 (#92), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Longer Query14271054

Writing & Preference Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 57.9 (#123), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Text13961077
LMArena Creative Writing13721091
LMArena Multi-Turn14091047
WildBench83.9%—
EQ-Bench 41064—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Wizardlm 13b?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 4.5 has 53 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper