Model comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Command R
Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 7.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Haiku 4.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
CohereSummary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher in 8 categories and Command R in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude Haiku 4.5 leads 57.9 to 38.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 73.6% for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 46.4% for Command R.
- Command R is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $5 for Claude Haiku 4.5.
- Claude Haiku 4.5 accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 128K.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | Command R | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Cohere |
| Noometry Index | 39.5 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2025-10-15 | 2024-08-30 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 200K | 128K |
| Max output | 64K | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1 | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $5 | $0.60 |
| Results tracked | 53 | 29 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 44.0 (#78), Command R: 29.3 (#306)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1169 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 66.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 64.7% | — |
| SciCode | 43.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 45.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.1% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 17.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 45.2% |
| ALE-Bench | 653.48 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Haiku 4.5: 33.6 (#52), Command R: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 35.5% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 68.7% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 45.5% | — |
| BALROG | 31.2% | — |
| ExploitBench | 13.7% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 458.89 | — |
Reasoning Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 15.1 (#320), Command R: 13.8 (#331)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1164 |
| DTBench | 73.6% | 46.4% |
| LMCA | 30.9% | 9.2% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 14.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 47.7% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 21.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 33.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.41 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.4 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 27.5% |
Math Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 44.9 (#78), Command R: 28.0 (#246)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1155 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 66.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 56.1% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 19.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | 96.4% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 5.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |
Knowledge Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 37.7 (#153), Command R: 31.0 (#221)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1442 | 1138 |
| GPQA Diamond | 71.2% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 13.2% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.5% | — |
| MMLU | — | 65.2% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Haiku 4.5: 26.8 (#118), Command R: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 0% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1420 | — |
Multilingual Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 49.9 (#129), Command R: 35.7 (#245)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1377 | 1174 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | 1182 |
| LMArena French | 1408 | 1162 |
| LMArena German | 1375 | 1176 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1339 | 1143 |
| LMArena Korean | 1347 | 1163 |
| LMArena Russian | 1381 | 1174 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | 1151 |
Instruction Following Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 71.4 (#149), Command R: 58.1 (#261)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1167 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 55.6% |
| IFEval | 80.1% | — |
Long Context Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 43.6 (#92), Command R: 36.3 (#231)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1427 | 1198 |
Writing & Preference Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 57.9 (#123), Command R: 38.2 (#254)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | 1187 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1372 | 1170 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | 1163 |
| WildBench | 83.9% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1064 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 16.7% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Command R?
Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 7.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Haiku 4.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Command R?
Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Claude Haiku 4.5 lists at $1 and $5.
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Command R better for coding?
Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Claude Haiku 4.5 does, with 200K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Command R share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 4.5 has 53 scored results on Noometry and Command R has 29.