Model comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic

39.5

Rank #165 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 25.5 to 15.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SWE-bench Verified (bash only): 66.6% for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 55.4% for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
  • Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper at $1 / $5 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 200K.
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
Claude Haiku 4.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.538.1
Released2025-10-152025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K262K
Max output64K66K
Input $ / M tokens$1$1.50
Output $ / M tokens$5$7.50
Results tracked5325

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 44.0 (#78), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)66.6%55.4%
LMArena WebDev13301275
WeirdML45.4%41.2%
LMArena Coding14531412
ALE-Bench653.48461.45
SWE-bench Multilingual64.7%—
SciCode43.3%—
GSO—4.9%
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 33.6 (#52), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench35.5%27.2%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard68.7%—
DeepResearch Bench45.5%—
BALROG31.2%—
ExploitBench13.7%—
Vending-Bench 2458.89—

Reasoning Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 15.1 (#320), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14201372
ARC-AGI-24%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%
NYT Connections (extended)14.3%—
ARC-AGI-147.7%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles8%—
DTBench73.6%—
LMCA30.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.41—
ForecastBench61.4—

Math Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 44.9 (#78), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Math13961365
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202566.7%—
Omni-MATH56.1%—
MATH Level 596.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)5.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Too close to call

Claude Haiku 4.5: 37.7 (#153), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Expert14421338
GPQA Diamond71.2%—
SimpleQA Verified13.2%—
MMLU-Pro77.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.8%—
GPQA (HELM)60.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Haiku 4.5: 26.8 (#118), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Blueprint-Bench 20%—
LMArena Document1420—

Multilingual Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 49.9 (#129), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English13771346
LMArena Chinese14171357
LMArena French14081398
LMArena German13751325
LMArena Japanese13391310
LMArena Korean13471305
LMArena Russian13811366
LMArena Spanish14201360

Instruction Following Too close to call

Claude Haiku 4.5: 71.4 (#149), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14141355
IFEval80.1%—

Long Context Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 43.6 (#92), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14271378

Writing & Preference Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 57.9 (#123), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text13961357
LMArena Creative Writing13721333
LMArena Multi-Turn14091365
WildBench83.9%—
EQ-Bench 41064—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct does, with 262K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 4.5 has 53 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper