Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 Tencent

39.6

Rank #163 Confirmed

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct Alibaba (Qwen)

38.1

Rank #190 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 55.3 to 50.2.
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.638.1
Released—2025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked1125

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Coding13191412
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
LMArena WebDev—1275
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—41.2%
ALE-Bench—461.45
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%

Reasoning Too close to call

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13081372
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%

Math Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Math12731365

Knowledge Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Expert—1338

Multilingual Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English12851346
LMArena Chinese13581357
LMArena Russian13051366
LMArena French—1398
LMArena German—1325
LMArena Japanese—1310
LMArena Korean—1305
LMArena Spanish—1360

Instruction Following Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12781355

Long Context Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13091378

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text13111357
LMArena Creative Writing12691333
LMArena Multi-Turn13031365

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper