Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Phi-3.5-mini

Claude Haiku 4.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#165); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic

39.5

Rank #165 Confirmed

Phi-3.5-mini Microsoft

36.9

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where Claude Haiku 4.5 leads 44.0 to 34.6.
  • Phi-3.5-mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 4.5Phi-3.5-mini
ProviderAnthropicMicrosoft
Noometry Index39.536.9
Released2025-10-152024-08-16
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output64K—
Input $ / M tokens$1—
Output $ / M tokens$5—
Results tracked535

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 44.0 (#78), Phi-3.5-mini: 34.6 (#232)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Phi-3.5-mini
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)66.6%—
LMArena WebDev1330—
SWE-bench Multilingual64.7%—
SciCode43.3%—
WeirdML45.4%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—32.8%
LMArena Coding1453—
BigCodeBench Complete—38.5%
ALE-Bench653.48—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Haiku 4.5: 33.6 (#52), Phi-3.5-mini: —

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Phi-3.5-mini
Terminal-Bench35.5%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard68.7%—
DeepResearch Bench45.5%—
BALROG31.2%—
ExploitBench13.7%—
Vending-Bench 2458.89—

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude Haiku 4.5: 15.1 (#320), Phi-3.5-mini: —

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Phi-3.5-mini
ARC-AGI-24%—
NYT Connections (extended)14.3%—
ARC-AGI-147.7%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1420—
DTBench73.6%—
LMCA30.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.41—
ForecastBench61.4—
PIQA—81%

Math Not comparable

Claude Haiku 4.5: 44.9 (#78), Phi-3.5-mini: —

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Phi-3.5-mini
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202566.7%—
Omni-MATH56.1%—
LMArena Math1396—
MATH Level 596.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)5.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—
GSM8K—86.2%

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Haiku 4.5: 37.7 (#153), Phi-3.5-mini: —

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Phi-3.5-mini
GPQA Diamond71.2%—
SimpleQA Verified13.2%—
MMLU-Pro77.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.8%—
GPQA (HELM)60.5%—
LMArena Expert1442—
BoolQ—78%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Haiku 4.5: 26.8 (#118), Phi-3.5-mini: —

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Phi-3.5-mini
Blueprint-Bench 20%—
LMArena Document1420—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Haiku 4.5: 49.9 (#129), Phi-3.5-mini: —

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Phi-3.5-mini
LMArena Non-English1377—
LMArena Chinese1417—
LMArena French1408—
LMArena German1375—
LMArena Japanese1339—
LMArena Korean1347—
LMArena Russian1381—
LMArena Spanish1420—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Haiku 4.5: 71.4 (#149), Phi-3.5-mini: —

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Phi-3.5-mini
IFEval80.1%—
LMArena Instruction Following1414—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Haiku 4.5: 43.6 (#92), Phi-3.5-mini: —

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Phi-3.5-mini
LMArena Longer Query1427—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Haiku 4.5: 57.9 (#123), Phi-3.5-mini: —

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Phi-3.5-mini
LMArena Text1396—
LMArena Creative Writing1372—
WildBench83.9%—
EQ-Bench 41064—
LMArena Multi-Turn1409—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Phi-3.5-mini?

Claude Haiku 4.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#165); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Phi-3.5-mini better for coding?

Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Phi-3.5-mini share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 4.5 has 53 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-mini has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper