Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Phi-3.5-mini

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has enough public results to be ranked (#165); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 Tencent

39.0

Rank #165 Confirmed

Phi-3.5-mini Microsoft

36.4

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 38.0 to 34.0.
  • Phi-3.5-mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Phi-3.5-mini specifications
Hunyuan Turbo 0110Phi-3.5-mini
ProviderTencentMicrosoft
Noometry Index39.036.4
Released—2024-08-16
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked115

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.0 (#168), Phi-3.5-mini: 34.0 (#231)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Phi-3.5-mini
BigCodeBench Instruct—32.8%
LMArena Coding1320—
BigCodeBench Complete—38.5%

Reasoning Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 25.0 (#135), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Phi-3.5-mini
LMArena Hard Prompts1308—
PIQA—81%

Math Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 32.9 (#180), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Phi-3.5-mini
LMArena Math1273—
GSM8K—86.2%

Knowledge Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Phi-3.5-mini: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Phi-3.5-mini
BoolQ—78%

Multilingual Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.5 (#178), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Phi-3.5-mini
LMArena Non-English1285—
LMArena Chinese1358—
LMArena Russian1305—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.7 (#190), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Phi-3.5-mini
LMArena Instruction Following1279—

Long Context Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#163), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Phi-3.5-mini
LMArena Longer Query1309—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.4 (#176), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Phi-3.5-mini
LMArena Text1311—
LMArena Creative Writing1269—
LMArena Multi-Turn1303—

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Phi-3.5-mini?

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has enough public results to be ranked (#165); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or Phi-3.5-mini better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Phi-3.5-mini share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-mini has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper