Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Phi-3.5-mini
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has enough public results to be ranked (#165); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 38.0 to 34.0.
- Phi-3.5-mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Phi-3.5-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 39.0 | 36.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-08-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 11 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.0 (#168), Phi-3.5-mini: 34.0 (#231)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1320 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 38.5% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 25.0 (#135), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1308 | — |
| PIQA | — | 81% |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 32.9 (#180), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1273 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| BoolQ | — | 78% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.5 (#178), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.7 (#190), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1279 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#163), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1309 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.4 (#176), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1303 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Phi-3.5-mini?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has enough public results to be ranked (#165); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or Phi-3.5-mini better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Phi-3.5-mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-mini has 5.