Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DBRX

Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.3 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic

39.3

Rank #155 Confirmed

DBRX Databricks

29.0

Rank #307 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher in 7 categories and DBRX in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude Haiku 4.5 leads 58.1 to 33.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 96.4% for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 11.7% for DBRX.
  • DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 4.5DBRX
ProviderAnthropicDatabricks
Noometry Index39.329.0
Released2025-10-152024-03-27
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output64K—
Input $ / M tokens$1—
Output $ / M tokens$5—
Results tracked5321

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 43.9 (#71), DBRX: 32.3 (#262)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5DBRX
LMArena Coding14541132
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)66.6%—
LMArena WebDev1330—
SWE-bench Multilingual64.7%—
SciCode43.3%—
WeirdML45.4%—
ALE-Bench653.48—
HumanEval+—70.1%
MBPP+—55.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Haiku 4.5: 33.5 (#50), DBRX: —

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5DBRX
Terminal-Bench35.5%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard68.7%—
DeepResearch Bench45.5%—
BALROG31.2%—
ExploitBench13.7%—
Vending-Bench 2458.89—

Reasoning DBRX leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 15.1 (#310), DBRX: 20.5 (#218)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5DBRX
LMArena Hard Prompts14201113
ARC-AGI-24%—
NYT Connections (extended)14.3%—
ARC-AGI-147.7%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles8%—
DTBench73.6%—
LMCA30.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.42—
ForecastBench61.4—

Math Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 43.0 (#69), DBRX: 22.3 (#265)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5DBRX
LMArena Math13951145
MATH Level 596.4%11.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202566.7%—
Omni-MATH56.1%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)5.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 37.6 (#146), DBRX: 14.9 (#289)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5DBRX
GPQA Diamond71.2%32.9%
LMArena Expert14431076
SimpleQA Verified13.2%—
MMLU-Pro77.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.8%—
GPQA (HELM)60.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Haiku 4.5: 27.0 (#111), DBRX: —

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5DBRX
Blueprint-Bench 20%—
LMArena Document1420—

Multilingual Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 50.1 (#124), DBRX: 29.4 (#263)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5DBRX
LMArena Non-English13761071
LMArena Chinese14151068
LMArena French14081095
LMArena German13771057
LMArena Japanese1339990
LMArena Korean1346993
LMArena Russian13801078
LMArena Spanish14201064

Instruction Following Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 71.6 (#144), DBRX: 57.7 (#265)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5DBRX
LMArena Instruction Following14141112
IFEval80.1%—

Long Context Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 43.6 (#86), DBRX: 33.7 (#253)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5DBRX
LMArena Longer Query14271112

Writing & Preference Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Claude Haiku 4.5: 58.1 (#119), DBRX: 33.7 (#271)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5DBRX
LMArena Text13961119
LMArena Creative Writing13711104
LMArena Multi-Turn14091111
WildBench83.9%—
EQ-Bench 41064—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than DBRX?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.3 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or DBRX better for coding?

Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 4.5 and DBRX share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 4.5 has 53 scored results on Noometry and DBRX has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper