Model comparison
Claude 3 Sonnet vs Trinity Large Thinking
Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Arcee AISummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher in 1 category and Trinity Large Thinking in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Trinity Large Thinking leads 37.6 to 10.7.
- Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3 Sonnet | Trinity Large Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 38.6 |
| Released | 2024-02-29 | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 80K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 30 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Trinity Large Thinking leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.6 (#302), Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1223 | 1381 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |
| WeirdML | 10.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 53.8% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 64% | — |
| MBPP+ | 69.3% | — |
Reasoning Claude 3 Sonnet leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 20.5 (#237), Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1197 | 1350 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| DTBench | 53.6% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.7 | — |
| WinoGrande | 75.1% | — |
Math Trinity Large Thinking leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.7 (#310), Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1213 | 1366 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 18.2% | — |
Knowledge Trinity Large Thinking leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#276), Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1173 | 1360 |
| GPQA Diamond | 40.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |
| MMLU | 75.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3 Sonnet: 25.2 (#125), Trinity Large Thinking: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 984 | — |
Multilingual Trinity Large Thinking leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 37.8 (#234), Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1205 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1189 | 1373 |
| LMArena French | 1229 | 1374 |
| LMArena German | 1204 | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1131 | 1311 |
| LMArena Korean | 1128 | 1306 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1337 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1204 | 1357 |
Instruction Following Trinity Large Thinking leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 62.8 (#235), Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1199 | 1334 |
Long Context Trinity Large Thinking leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#228), Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1211 | 1355 |
Writing & Preference Trinity Large Thinking leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.1 (#238), Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1186 | 1320 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1227 | 1342 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than Trinity Large Thinking?
Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3 Sonnet or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?
Trinity Large Thinking scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.1 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and Trinity Large Thinking share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.