Model comparison

Claude 3 Sonnet vs Step 3.5 Flash

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Sonnet Anthropic

29.0

Rank #319 Confirmed

Step 3.5 Flash StepFun

42.3

Rank #116 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3.5 Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.5 Flash leads 42.6 to 10.7.
  • Step 3.5 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 Sonnet and Step 3.5 Flash specifications
Claude 3 SonnetStep 3.5 Flash
ProviderAnthropicStepFun
Noometry Index29.042.3
Released2024-02-292026-01-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—256K
Max output—256K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.30
Results tracked3019

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3.5 Flash leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.6 (#302), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.4 (#105)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Coding12231436
WeirdML10.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct42.7%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.8%—
HumanEval+64%—
MBPP+69.3%—

Reasoning Step 3.5 Flash leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 20.5 (#237), Step 3.5 Flash: 22.2 (#202)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts11971411
NYT Connections (extended)—28.4%
DTBench53.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index120.7—
WinoGrande75.1%—

Math Step 3.5 Flash leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.7 (#310), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.6 (#84)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Math12131408
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—66.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%—
MATH Level 518.2%—

Knowledge Step 3.5 Flash leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#276), Step 3.5 Flash: 39.6 (#132)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Expert11731421
GPQA Diamond40.6%—
MMLU75.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 25.2 (#125), Step 3.5 Flash: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Vision984—

Multilingual Step 3.5 Flash leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 37.8 (#234), Step 3.5 Flash: 50.5 (#119)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Non-English12051385
LMArena Chinese11891447
LMArena French12291421
LMArena German12041405
LMArena Japanese11311354
LMArena Korean11281352
LMArena Russian12271385
LMArena Spanish12041419

Instruction Following Step 3.5 Flash leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 62.8 (#235), Step 3.5 Flash: 73.1 (#124)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following11991385

Long Context Step 3.5 Flash leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#228), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#117)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Longer Query12111402

Writing & Preference Step 3.5 Flash leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.1 (#238), Step 3.5 Flash: 58.8 (#113)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text12181403
LMArena Creative Writing11861357
LMArena Multi-Turn12271405

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Sonnet or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and Step 3.5 Flash share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper