Model comparison

Claude 3 Sonnet vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Sonnet Anthropic

28.8

Rank #311 Confirmed

Qwen3 Coder Next Alibaba (Qwen)

33.8

Rank #229 Reported

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 Coder Next in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 35.8 to 29.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 10.2% for Claude 3 Sonnet and 34.4% for Qwen3 Coder Next.
  • Qwen3 Coder Next has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 Sonnet and Qwen3 Coder Next specifications
Claude 3 SonnetQwen3 Coder Next
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index28.833.8
Released2024-02-292026-02-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.12
Output $ / M tokens—$0.80
Results tracked303

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 Coder Next leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.2 (#296), Qwen3 Coder Next: 35.8 (#206)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen3 Coder Next
WeirdML10.2%34.4%
SciCode—32.3%
BigCodeBench Instruct42.7%—
LMArena Coding1223—
BigCodeBench Complete53.8%—
HumanEval+64%—
MBPP+69.3%—

Reasoning Qwen3 Coder Next leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 19.7 (#232), Qwen3 Coder Next: 21.7 (#191)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen3 Coder Next
CritPt—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts1197—
DTBench53.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index120.69—
WinoGrande75.1%—

Math Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.0 (#305), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen3 Coder Next
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%—
LMArena Math1213—
MATH Level 518.2%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#271), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen3 Coder Next
GPQA Diamond40.6%—
LMArena Expert1173—
MMLU75.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 24.7 (#120), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Vision984—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 38.0 (#229), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Non-English1205—
LMArena Chinese1188—
LMArena French1228—
LMArena German1204—
LMArena Japanese1131—
LMArena Korean1128—
LMArena Russian1227—
LMArena Spanish1204—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 63.1 (#230), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Instruction Following1200—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#223), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Longer Query1211—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.3 (#233), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Text1218—
LMArena Creative Writing1186—
LMArena Multi-Turn1227—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Sonnet or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper