Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic

29.2

Rank #315 Confirmed

Qwen3 Coder Next Alibaba (Qwen)

34.3

Rank #232 Reported

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 Coder Next in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 22.4 to 17.7.
  • Qwen3 Coder Next has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 HaikuQwen3 Coder Next
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.234.3
Released2024-10-222026-02-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.12
Output $ / M tokens—$0.80
Results tracked493

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 Coder Next leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.9 (#265), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3 Coder Next
SciCode27.4%32.3%
WeirdML30.7%34.4%
Aider Polyglot28%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%—
LiveBench Coding51.4%—
LMArena Coding1286—
BigCodeBench Complete59%—
CadEval32%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 28.0 (#95), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3 Coder Next
BALROG19.3%—

Reasoning Qwen3 Coder Next leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.7 (#290), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3 Coder Next
CritPt0%0%
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1251—
DTBench56.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.15—
LiveBench43.5%—

Math Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 14.7 (#300), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3 Coder Next
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
Omni-MATH22.4%—
LiveBench Math35.5%—
LMArena Math1244—
MATH Level 546.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#281), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3 Coder Next
GPQA Diamond38.1%—
MMLU-Pro60.5%—
Confabulations36.7%—
GPQA (HELM)36.3%—
LMArena Expert1208—
MMLU74.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.8 (#117), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Vision1092—
GeoBench34%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.0 (#218), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Non-English1238—
LMArena Chinese1229—
LMArena French1264—
LMArena German1237—
LMArena Japanese1175—
LMArena Korean1173—
LMArena Russian1253—
LMArena Spanish1261—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 62.9 (#234), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3 Coder Next
LiveBench Instruction Following61.9%—
IFEval79.2%—
LMArena Instruction Following1241—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#200), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Longer Query1261—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.7 (#234), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Text1255—
LMArena Creative Writing1233—
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1146—
WildBench76%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1265—
LiveBench Language35.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.3 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper