Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Sonnet vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Sonnet Anthropic

29.0

Rank #319 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 50.5 to 10.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.5% for Claude 3 Sonnet and 93.3% for Qwen3.7 Plus.

Side by side

Claude 3 SonnetQwen3.7 Plus
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.045.3
Released2024-02-292026-06-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.60
Results tracked3032

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.6 (#302), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Coding12231473
FrontierCode—10.2%
SciCode—45.5%
WeirdML10.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct42.7%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.8%—
HumanEval+64%—
MBPP+69.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 20.5 (#237), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts11971460
DTBench53.6%84%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.7147.37
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
CritPt—9.1%
Chess Puzzles—24%
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
LMCA—37.6%
WinoGrande75.1%—

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.7 (#310), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen3.7 Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%93.3%
LMArena Math12131466
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—34.4%
MATH Level 518.2%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#276), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond40.6%87.9%
LMArena Expert11731467
MMLU75.9%—

Multimodal Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 25.2 (#125), Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision9841279
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 37.8 (#234), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English12051445
LMArena Chinese11891510
LMArena French12291473
LMArena German12041471
LMArena Japanese11311413
LMArena Korean11281415
LMArena Russian12271457
LMArena Spanish12041457

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 62.8 (#235), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following11991440

Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#228), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query12111455

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.1 (#238), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text12181455
LMArena Creative Writing11861439
LMArena Multi-Turn12271460

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Sonnet or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper