Model comparison

Claude 3 Sonnet vs Mercury

Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Sonnet Anthropic

28.8

Rank #311 Confirmed

Mercury Inception

37.3

Rank #192 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher in 1 category and Mercury in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Mercury leads 38.1 to 29.2.

Side by side

Claude 3 Sonnet and Mercury specifications
Claude 3 SonnetMercury
ProviderAnthropicInception
Noometry Index28.837.3
Released2024-02-29—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked309

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mercury leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.2 (#296), Mercury: 38.1 (#164)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMercury
LMArena Coding12231323
WeirdML10.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct42.7%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.8%—
HumanEval+64%—
MBPP+69.3%—

Reasoning Claude 3 Sonnet leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 19.7 (#232), Mercury: 16.8 (#288)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMercury
LMArena Hard Prompts11971284
Kagi LLM Benchmark—21.6%
DTBench53.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index120.69—
WinoGrande75.1%—

Math Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.0 (#305), Mercury: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMercury
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%—
LMArena Math1213—
MATH Level 518.2%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#271), Mercury: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMercury
GPQA Diamond40.6%—
LMArena Expert1173—
MMLU75.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 24.7 (#120), Mercury: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMercury
LMArena Vision984—

Multilingual Mercury leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 38.0 (#229), Mercury: 41.7 (#201)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMercury
LMArena Non-English12051259
LMArena Chinese1188—
LMArena French1228—
LMArena German1204—
LMArena Japanese1131—
LMArena Korean1128—
LMArena Russian1227—
LMArena Spanish1204—

Instruction Following Mercury leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 63.1 (#230), Mercury: 65.3 (#220)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMercury
LMArena Instruction Following12001238

Long Context Mercury leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#223), Mercury: 38.3 (#193)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMercury
LMArena Longer Query12111264

Writing & Preference Mercury leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.3 (#233), Mercury: 46.2 (#216)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMercury
LMArena Text12181282
LMArena Creative Writing11861186
LMArena Multi-Turn12271283

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than Mercury?

Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Sonnet or Mercury better for coding?

Mercury scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and Mercury share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and Mercury has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper