Model comparison

Claude 3 Sonnet vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Sonnet Anthropic

28.8

Rank #311 Confirmed

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 Tencent

37.2

Rank #193 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 33.0 to 10.0.

Side by side

Claude 3 Sonnet and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 specifications
Claude 3 SonnetHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
ProviderAnthropicTencent
Noometry Index28.837.2
Released2024-02-29—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3012

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.2 (#296), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 36.5 (#192)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Coding12231270
WeirdML10.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct42.7%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.8%—
HumanEval+64%—
MBPP+69.3%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 19.7 (#232), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 23.9 (#157)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Hard Prompts11971264
DTBench53.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index120.69—
WinoGrande75.1%—

Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.0 (#305), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.0 (#179)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Math12131274
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%—
MATH Level 518.2%—

Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#271), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.6 (#192)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Expert11731248
GPQA Diamond40.6%—
MMLU75.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 24.7 (#120), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Vision984—

Multilingual Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 38.0 (#229), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.9 (#198)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Non-English12051262
LMArena Chinese11881319
LMArena Russian12271258
LMArena French1228—
LMArena German1204—
LMArena Japanese1131—
LMArena Korean1128—
LMArena Spanish1204—

Instruction Following Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 63.1 (#230), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.8 (#214)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Instruction Following12001245

Long Context Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#223), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#168)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Longer Query12111301

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.3 (#233), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.4 (#209)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Text12181274
LMArena Creative Writing11861242
LMArena Multi-Turn12271275

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Sonnet or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.5 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper