Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.5

Rank #310 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #42 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Max in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 62.4 to 14.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 4.7% for Claude 3 Opus and 95.6% for Qwen3.7 Max.

Side by side

Claude 3 OpusQwen3.7 Max
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.551.5
Released2024-02-292026-05-19
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked4633

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads

Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Coding12641498
SWE-bench Verified—77.3%
LMArena WebDev—1515
SciCode—48.8%
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
ALE-Bench—1,189
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen3.7 Max
Cybench10%—
GBAEval—0.4%
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen3.7 Max
SimpleBench23.5%70.4%
Chess Puzzles5%19%
LMArena Hard Prompts12451483
DTBench61.6%92.3%
LMCA17%44%
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91153.68
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—13.4%
EnigmaEval0.8%—
EBR-Bench—9.5%
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
ForecastBench58.4—
LiveBench49.2%—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math Qwen3.7 Max leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen3.7 Max
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%95.6%
LMArena Math12731490
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—34.1%
ProofBench—26%
LiveBench Math43.6%—
MATH Level 537.5%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen3.7 Max
GPQA Diamond47.2%90.9%
SimpleQA Verified12.6%55.8%
LMArena Expert12231488
Confabulations22.7%—
MMLU84.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), Qwen3.7 Max: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Vision1023—

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Max leads

Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English12581474
LMArena Chinese12481530
LMArena Russian12801484
LMArena French1275—
LMArena German1258—
LMArena Japanese1204—
LMArena Korean1187—
LMArena Spanish1246—

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads

Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following12481460
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—

Long Context Qwen3.7 Max leads

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query12591482

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads

Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text12621476
LMArena Creative Writing12351449
LMArena Multi-Turn12751481
EQ-Bench 4—1110
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Opus or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Qwen3.7 Max share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper