Model comparison
Claude 3 Opus vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.1 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 52.2 to 13.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 4.7% for Claude 3 Opus and 91.1% for Qwen3.6 Max Preview.
Side by side
| Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3.6 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 51.1 |
| Released | 2024-02-29 | 2026-04-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $7.80 |
| Results tracked | 46 | 29 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Claude 3 Opus: 32.4 (#261), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.6 (#50)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1264 | 1472 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 76.7% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1482 |
| WeirdML | 19.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.5% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.4% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 77.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 73.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3 Opus: 24.3 (#110), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 10% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 29.5% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 4,254 |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Claude 3 Opus: 14.2 (#318), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 40.8 (#47)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 23.5% | 63% |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | 1457 |
| DTBench | 61.6% | 87.2% |
| LMCA | 17% | 42.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 126.91 | 149.27 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.1% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 40.6% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 19% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 57.9% | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
| LiveBench | 49.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 88.5% | — |
Math Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Claude 3 Opus: 13.9 (#293), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 52.2 (#40)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.7% | 91.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1465 |
| LiveBench Math | 43.6% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 37.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 23.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#262), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#35)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.2% | 87.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.6% | 52% |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1476 |
| Confabulations | 22.7% | — |
| MMLU | 84.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3 Opus: 26.6 (#112), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1023 | — |
Multilingual Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Claude 3 Opus: 41.6 (#202), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.3 (#46)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1258 | 1436 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1248 | 1487 |
| LMArena French | 1274 | 1449 |
| LMArena Russian | 1280 | 1444 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1246 | 1452 |
| LMArena German | 1258 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1204 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1187 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Claude 3 Opus: 64.3 (#223), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.8 (#51)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1248 | 1437 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 63.9% | — |
Long Context Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#197), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#59)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1259 | 1457 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Claude 3 Opus: 47.4 (#208), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 64.0 (#58)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1262 | 1447 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1435 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1456 |
| LiveBench Language | 50.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Opus better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?
Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.1 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3 Opus or Qwen3.6 Max Preview better for coding?
Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?
22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.