Model comparison
Claude 3 Opus vs Qwen3-30B-A3B
Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 25 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 25 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3-30B-A3B in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3-30B-A3B leads 37.4 to 14.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 4.7% for Claude 3 Opus and 70.3% for Qwen3-30B-A3B.
- Qwen3-30B-A3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3-30B-A3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 38.9 |
| Released | 2024-02-29 | 2025-04-28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 41K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Results tracked | 46 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3-30B-A3B leads
Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.5 (#194)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 19.2% | 29.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1264 | 1416 |
| SciCode | — | 33.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.5% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.4% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 77.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 73.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3-30B-A3B leads
Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 29.8 (#82)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41.4% |
| Cybench | 10% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 29.5% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3-30B-A3B leads
Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 22.2 (#204)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | 8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1245 | 1398 |
| DTBench | 61.6% | 69.3% |
| LMCA | 17% | 22.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 126.91 | 139.63 |
| SimpleBench | 23.5% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 40.6% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 57.9% | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
| LiveBench | 49.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 88.5% | — |
Math Qwen3-30B-A3B leads
Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.4 (#157)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.7% | 70.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1394 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 47.8% |
| LiveBench Math | 43.6% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 37.5% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3-30B-A3B leads
Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 41.8 (#105)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.2% | 70.1% |
| Confabulations | 22.7% | 12.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1396 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.6% | — |
| MMLU | 84.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), Qwen3-30B-A3B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1023 | — |
Multilingual Qwen3-30B-A3B leads
Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 49.5 (#132)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1258 | 1372 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1248 | 1433 |
| LMArena French | 1275 | 1418 |
| LMArena German | 1258 | 1380 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1204 | 1337 |
| LMArena Korean | 1187 | 1331 |
| LMArena Russian | 1280 | 1370 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1246 | 1404 |
Instruction Following Qwen3-30B-A3B leads
Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 72.0 (#142)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1248 | 1363 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 63.9% | — |
Long Context Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 31.0 (#283)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1259 | 1379 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 40.6% |
Writing & Preference Qwen3-30B-A3B leads
Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 55.6 (#143)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1262 | 1384 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1317 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1378 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 75.3% |
| LiveBench Language | 50.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Opus better than Qwen3-30B-A3B?
Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3 Opus or Qwen3-30B-A3B better for coding?
Qwen3-30B-A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.5 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Qwen3-30B-A3B share?
25 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-30B-A3B has 32.