Model comparison
Claude 3 Opus vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
Claude 3 Opus and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.5 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 5 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude 3 Opus leads 47.2 to 27.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 57.4% for Claude 3 Opus and 40.6% for Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct.
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3 Opus | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2024-02-29 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 46 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.5% | 29.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1264 | 1039 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.4% | 40.6% |
| WeirdML | 19.2% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 77.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 73.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 10% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 29.5% | — |
Reasoning Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1245 | 1028 |
| SimpleBench | 23.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 0.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 40.6% | — |
| DTBench | 61.6% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 57.9% | — |
| LMCA | 17% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 126.91 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
| LiveBench | 49.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 88.5% | — |
Math Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1089 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.7% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 43.6% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 37.5% | — |
Knowledge Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 984 |
| GPQA Diamond | 47.2% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.6% | — |
| Confabulations | 22.7% | — |
| MMLU | 84.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1023 | — |
Multilingual Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1258 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1248 | 1016 |
| LMArena French | 1275 | 1039 |
| LMArena German | 1258 | 1006 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1204 | 899 |
| LMArena Korean | 1187 | 856 |
| LMArena Russian | 1280 | 1004 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1246 | 1059 |
Instruction Following Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1248 | 1023 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 63.9% | — |
Long Context Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1259 | 996 |
Writing & Preference Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1262 | 1050 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 989 |
| LiveBench Language | 50.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Opus better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?
Claude 3 Opus and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.5 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Claude 3 Opus or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?
Claude 3 Opus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.