Model comparison
Claude 3 Opus vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Claude 3 Opus and OLMo 2 Furious 13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.3 vs 29.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 4 categories and OLMo 2 Furious 13B in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 21.3 to 13.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Language: 50.4% for Claude 3 Opus and 11.2% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3 Opus | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 29.2 |
| Released | 2024-02-29 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 46 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 32.4 (#261), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 38.6% | 10.4% |
| WeirdML | 19.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1264 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.4% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 77.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 73.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3 Opus: 24.3 (#110), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 10% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 29.5% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Claude 3 Opus: 14.2 (#318), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 40.6% | 16.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 57.9% | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | 49.2% | 22.1% |
| SimpleBench | 23.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 0.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | — |
| DTBench | 61.6% | — |
| LMCA | 17% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 126.91 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
| WinoGrande | 88.5% | — |
Math OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Claude 3 Opus: 13.9 (#293), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 43.6% | 13.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1273 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 37.5% | — |
Knowledge Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#262), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.2% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| Confabulations | 22.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | — |
| MMLU | 84.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3 Opus: 26.6 (#112), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1023 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 3 Opus: 41.6 (#202), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1258 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1248 | — |
| LMArena French | 1274 | — |
| LMArena German | 1258 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1204 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1280 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1246 | — |
Instruction Following Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 64.3 (#223), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 63.9% | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1248 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#197), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1259 | — |
Writing & Preference Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 47.4 (#208), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 50.4% | 11.2% |
| LMArena Text | 1262 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Opus better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Claude 3 Opus and OLMo 2 Furious 13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.3 vs 29.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Claude 3 Opus or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Claude 3 Opus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.4 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.