Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs MiMo-V2-Flash

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.5

Rank #310 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

41.3

Rank #138 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 38.3 to 14.8.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 OpusMiMo-V2-Flash
ProviderAnthropicXiaomi
Noometry Index29.541.3
Released2024-02-292025-12-16
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked4621

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Coding12641443
LMArena WebDev—1330
SciCode—25.9%
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
ALE-Bench—737.95
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), MiMo-V2-Flash: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2-Flash
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts12451420
SimpleBench23.5%—
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles5%—
EnigmaEval0.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
DTBench61.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA17%—
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91—
ForecastBench58.4—
LiveBench49.2%—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Math12731396
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%—
LiveBench Math43.6%—
MATH Level 537.5%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Expert12231425
GPQA Diamond47.2%—
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
Confabulations22.7%—
MMLU84.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), MiMo-V2-Flash: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Vision1023—

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Non-English12581392
LMArena Chinese12481462
LMArena French12751429
LMArena German12581395
LMArena Japanese12041325
LMArena Korean11871358
LMArena Russian12801387
LMArena Spanish12461420

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following12481392
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—

Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Longer Query12591409

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Text12621411
LMArena Creative Writing12351375
LMArena Multi-Turn12751404
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Opus or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper