Model comparison
Claude 3 Haiku vs Phi-3.5-mini
Claude 3 Haiku has enough public results to be ranked (#333); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Phi-3.5-mini in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Phi-3.5-mini leads 34.0 to 26.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 50.1% for Claude 3 Haiku and 38.5% for Phi-3.5-mini.
- Phi-3.5-mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3 Haiku | Phi-3.5-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 25.7 | 36.4 |
| Released | 2024-03-07 | 2024-08-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 37 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Phi-3.5-mini leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 26.1 (#320), Phi-3.5-mini: 34.0 (#231)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 39.4% | 32.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 50.1% | 38.5% |
| WeirdML | 9.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1199 | — |
| CadEval | 12% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 68.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 68.8% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 15.7 (#303), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 34.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1174 | — |
| DTBench | 50.1% | — |
| LMCA | 8.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.3 | — |
| ForecastBench | 53.2 | — |
| PIQA | — | 81% |
| WinoGrande | 74.2% | — |
Math Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 9.2 (#313), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1188 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 14.9% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#280), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 36.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 34.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1148 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 78% |
| MMLU | 73.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 23.1 (#123), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 950 | — |
| ScienceQA | 72% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#238), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1178 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1155 | — |
| LMArena French | 1194 | — |
| LMArena German | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1102 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1108 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1204 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1165 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 61.5 (#242), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1174 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#232), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1191 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 29.8 (#286), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1195 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1157 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 717 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Phi-3.5-mini?
Claude 3 Haiku has enough public results to be ranked (#333); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Claude 3 Haiku or Phi-3.5-mini better for coding?
Phi-3.5-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.0 versus 26.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Phi-3.5-mini share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-mini has 5.