Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs Mistral Small 3.2

Mistral Small 3.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic

25.7

Rank #333 Confirmed

Mistral Small 3.2 Mistral AI

30.8

Rank #271 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Mistral Small 3.2 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Mistral Small 3.2 leads 24.9 to 9.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.8% for Claude 3 Haiku and 30.3% for Mistral Small 3.2.
  • Mistral Small 3.2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 Haiku and Mistral Small 3.2 specifications
Claude 3 HaikuMistral Small 3.2
ProviderAnthropicMistral AI
Noometry Index25.730.8
Released2024-03-072025-06-20
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—256K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.0938
Output $ / M tokens—$0.25
Results tracked376

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 26.1 (#320), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMistral Small 3.2
WeirdML9.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct39.4%—
LMArena Coding1199—
BigCodeBench Complete50.1%—
CadEval12%—
HumanEval+68.9%—
MBPP+68.8%—

Reasoning Mistral Small 3.2 leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 15.7 (#303), Mistral Small 3.2: 17.5 (#282)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMistral Small 3.2
Kagi LLM Benchmark34.2%40.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index118.3131.73
Chess Puzzles—1%
LMArena Hard Prompts1174—
DTBench50.1%—
LMCA8.8%—
ForecastBench53.2—
WinoGrande74.2%—

Math Mistral Small 3.2 leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 9.2 (#313), Mistral Small 3.2: 24.9 (#251)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMistral Small 3.2
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.8%30.3%
LMArena Math1188—
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge Mistral Small 3.2 leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#280), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.8 (#249)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMistral Small 3.2
GPQA Diamond36.3%49.1%
Confabulations34.2%—
LMArena Expert1148—
MMLU73.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 23.1 (#123), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMistral Small 3.2
LMArena Vision950—
ScienceQA72%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#238), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMistral Small 3.2
LMArena Non-English1178—
LMArena Chinese1155—
LMArena French1194—
LMArena German1174—
LMArena Japanese1102—
LMArena Korean1108—
LMArena Russian1204—
LMArena Spanish1165—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 61.5 (#242), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMistral Small 3.2
LMArena Instruction Following1174—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#232), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMistral Small 3.2
LMArena Longer Query1191—

Writing & Preference Mistral Small 3.2 leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 29.8 (#286), Mistral Small 3.2: 45.1 (#219)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMistral Small 3.2
EQ-Bench Creative Writing7171255
LMArena Text1195—
LMArena Creative Writing1157—
LMArena Multi-Turn1190—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Mistral Small 3.2?

Mistral Small 3.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Mistral Small 3.2 share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper