Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs Wizardlm 13b

Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic

25.9

Rank #340 Confirmed

Wizardlm 13b Microsoft

31.4

Rank #274 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 3 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Wizardlm 13b leads 30.2 to 9.8.
  • Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 Haiku and Wizardlm 13b specifications
Claude 3 HaikuWizardlm 13b
ProviderAnthropicMicrosoft
Noometry Index25.931.4
Released2024-03-07—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3710

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Wizardlm 13b leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 26.4 (#325), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuWizardlm 13b
LMArena Coding11991035
WeirdML9.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct39.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete50.1%—
CadEval12%—
HumanEval+68.9%—
MBPP+68.8%—

Reasoning Wizardlm 13b leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 16.3 (#307), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuWizardlm 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts11741018
Kagi LLM Benchmark34.2%—
DTBench50.1%—
LMCA8.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.35—
ForecastBench53.2—
WinoGrande74.2%—

Math Wizardlm 13b leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 9.8 (#319), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuWizardlm 13b
LMArena Math11881017
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.8%—
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#285), Wizardlm 13b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuWizardlm 13b
GPQA Diamond36.3%—
Confabulations34.2%—
LMArena Expert1148—
MMLU73.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 23.6 (#128), Wizardlm 13b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuWizardlm 13b
LMArena Vision950—
ScienceQA72%—

Multilingual Claude 3 Haiku leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.0 (#243), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuWizardlm 13b
LMArena Non-English11781034
LMArena Chinese11551023
LMArena French1195—
LMArena German1174—
LMArena Japanese1102—
LMArena Korean1109—
LMArena Russian1204—
LMArena Spanish1166—

Instruction Following Claude 3 Haiku leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 61.3 (#247), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuWizardlm 13b
LMArena Instruction Following11731048

Long Context Claude 3 Haiku leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#237), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuWizardlm 13b
LMArena Longer Query11901054

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Claude 3 Haiku: 29.7 (#291), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuWizardlm 13b
LMArena Text11951077
LMArena Creative Writing11571091
LMArena Multi-Turn11901047
EQ-Bench Creative Writing717—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Wizardlm 13b?

Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Haiku or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Wizardlm 13b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.1 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper