Model comparison
Claude 3 Haiku vs Mistral Medium 3.1
Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Medium 3.1 in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.1 leads 55.6 to 29.8.
Side by side
| Claude 3 Haiku | Mistral Medium 3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 25.7 | 31.5 |
| Released | 2024-03-07 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 105K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 37 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 26.1 (#320), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 9.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 39.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1199 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 50.1% | — |
| CadEval | 12% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 68.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 68.8% | — |
Reasoning Claude 3 Haiku leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 15.7 (#303), Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.1 (#336)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 34.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 6.5% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1174 | — |
| DTBench | 50.1% | — |
| LMCA | 8.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.3 | — |
| ForecastBench | 53.2 | — |
| WinoGrande | 74.2% | — |
Math Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 9.2 (#313), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1188 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 14.9% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#280), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 36.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 34.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1148 | — |
| MMLU | 73.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 23.1 (#123), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 950 | — |
| ScienceQA | 72% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#238), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1178 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1155 | — |
| LMArena French | 1194 | — |
| LMArena German | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1102 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1108 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1204 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1165 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 61.5 (#242), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1174 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#232), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1191 | — |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 29.8 (#286), Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.6 (#140)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 717 | 1476 |
| LMArena Text | 1195 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1157 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Mistral Medium 3.1?
Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.