Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic

25.7

Rank #333 Confirmed

Mistral Medium 3.1 Mistral AI

31.5

Rank #260 Reported

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Medium 3.1 in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.1 leads 55.6 to 29.8.

Side by side

Claude 3 Haiku and Mistral Medium 3.1 specifications
Claude 3 HaikuMistral Medium 3.1
ProviderAnthropicMistral AI
Noometry Index25.731.5
Released2024-03-07—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—131K
Max output—105K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked373

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 26.1 (#320), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMistral Medium 3.1
WeirdML9.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct39.4%—
LMArena Coding1199—
BigCodeBench Complete50.1%—
CadEval12%—
HumanEval+68.9%—
MBPP+68.8%—

Reasoning Claude 3 Haiku leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 15.7 (#303), Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.1 (#336)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMistral Medium 3.1
Kagi LLM Benchmark34.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)—6.5%
Thematic Generalization—20.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1174—
DTBench50.1%—
LMCA8.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.3—
ForecastBench53.2—
WinoGrande74.2%—

Math Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 9.2 (#313), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMistral Medium 3.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.8%—
LMArena Math1188—
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#280), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMistral Medium 3.1
GPQA Diamond36.3%—
Confabulations34.2%—
LMArena Expert1148—
MMLU73.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 23.1 (#123), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Vision950—
ScienceQA72%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#238), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Non-English1178—
LMArena Chinese1155—
LMArena French1194—
LMArena German1174—
LMArena Japanese1102—
LMArena Korean1108—
LMArena Russian1204—
LMArena Spanish1165—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 61.5 (#242), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Instruction Following1174—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#232), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Longer Query1191—

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 29.8 (#286), Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.6 (#140)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMistral Medium 3.1
EQ-Bench Creative Writing7171476
LMArena Text1195—
LMArena Creative Writing1157—
LMArena Multi-Turn1190—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Mistral Medium 3.1?

Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper