Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs Qwen3-4B

Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic

25.9

Rank #340 Confirmed

Qwen3-4B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.9

Rank #264 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-4B in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3-4B leads 29.7 to 9.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.8% for Claude 3 Haiku and 52.2% for Qwen3-4B.
  • Qwen3-4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 HaikuQwen3-4B
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index25.931.9
Released2024-03-072025-04-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked376

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 26.4 (#325), Qwen3-4B: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3-4B
WeirdML9.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct39.4%—
LMArena Coding1199—
BigCodeBench Complete50.1%—
CadEval12%—
HumanEval+68.9%—
MBPP+68.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3-4B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—35.7%

Reasoning Qwen3-4B leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 16.3 (#307), Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3-4B
Kagi LLM Benchmark34.2%—
Chess Puzzles—4%
LMArena Hard Prompts1174—
DTBench50.1%—
LMCA8.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.35—
ForecastBench53.2—
WinoGrande74.2%—

Math Qwen3-4B leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 9.8 (#319), Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3-4B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.8%52.2%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—38.5%
LMArena Math1188—
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge Qwen3-4B leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#285), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3-4B
GPQA Diamond36.3%52.3%
Confabulations34.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.7%
LMArena Expert1148—
MMLU73.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 23.6 (#128), Qwen3-4B: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3-4B
LMArena Vision950—
ScienceQA72%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.0 (#243), Qwen3-4B: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3-4B
LMArena Non-English1178—
LMArena Chinese1155—
LMArena French1195—
LMArena German1174—
LMArena Japanese1102—
LMArena Korean1109—
LMArena Russian1204—
LMArena Spanish1166—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 61.3 (#247), Qwen3-4B: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3-4B
LMArena Instruction Following1173—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#237), Qwen3-4B: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3-4B
LMArena Longer Query1190—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 29.7 (#291), Qwen3-4B: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3-4B
LMArena Text1195—
LMArena Creative Writing1157—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing717—
LMArena Multi-Turn1190—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Qwen3-4B?

Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Qwen3-4B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper