Model comparison
Claude 3 Haiku vs MiMo-V2-Pro
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 29.7.
Side by side
| Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 43.0 |
| Released | 2024-03-07 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 37 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 26.4 (#325), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1199 | 1476 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| WeirdML | 9.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 39.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 50.1% | — |
| CadEval | 12% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |
| HumanEval+ | 68.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 68.8% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 16.3 (#307), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1174 | 1457 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 34.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
| DTBench | 50.1% | — |
| LMCA | 8.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.35 | — |
| ForecastBench | 53.2 | — |
| WinoGrande | 74.2% | — |
Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 9.8 (#319), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1447 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 14.9% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#285), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1148 | 1478 |
| GPQA Diamond | 36.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 34.2% | — |
| MMLU | 73.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3 Haiku: 23.6 (#128), MiMo-V2-Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 950 | — |
| ScienceQA | 72% | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 36.0 (#243), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1178 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1155 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 1195 | 1469 |
| LMArena German | 1174 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1102 | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | 1109 | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | 1204 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1166 | 1457 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 61.3 (#247), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1173 | 1445 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#237), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1190 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Claude 3 Haiku: 29.7 (#291), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1195 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1157 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | 1456 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 717 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Haiku better than MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3 Haiku or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and MiMo-V2-Pro share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.