Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs Granite 4.1 8b

Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic

25.9

Rank #340 Confirmed

Granite 4.1 8b IBM

37.4

Rank #205 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 4.1 8b in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Granite 4.1 8b leads 36.4 to 9.8.
  • Granite 4.1 8b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 Haiku and Granite 4.1 8b specifications
Claude 3 HaikuGranite 4.1 8b
ProviderAnthropicIBM
Noometry Index25.937.4
Released2024-03-07—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3713

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.1 8b leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 26.4 (#325), Granite 4.1 8b: 30.1 (#297)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Coding11991312
LMArena WebDev—1192
WeirdML9.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct39.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete50.1%—
CadEval12%—
HumanEval+68.9%—
MBPP+68.8%—

Reasoning Granite 4.1 8b leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 16.3 (#307), Granite 4.1 8b: 25.7 (#143)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Hard Prompts11741293
Kagi LLM Benchmark34.2%—
DTBench50.1%—
LMCA8.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.35—
ForecastBench53.2—
WinoGrande74.2%—

Math Granite 4.1 8b leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 9.8 (#319), Granite 4.1 8b: 36.4 (#166)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Math11881312
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.8%—
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge Granite 4.1 8b leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#285), Granite 4.1 8b: 36.1 (#174)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Expert11481309
GPQA Diamond36.3%—
Confabulations34.2%—
MMLU73.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 23.6 (#128), Granite 4.1 8b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Vision950—
ScienceQA72%—

Multilingual Granite 4.1 8b leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.0 (#243), Granite 4.1 8b: 41.7 (#204)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Non-English11781261
LMArena Chinese11551337
LMArena Russian12041240
LMArena French1195—
LMArena German1174—
LMArena Japanese1102—
LMArena Korean1109—
LMArena Spanish1166—

Instruction Following Granite 4.1 8b leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 61.3 (#247), Granite 4.1 8b: 66.9 (#203)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Instruction Following11731269

Long Context Granite 4.1 8b leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#237), Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#193)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Longer Query11901275

Writing & Preference Granite 4.1 8b leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 29.7 (#291), Granite 4.1 8b: 48.1 (#204)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Text11951290
LMArena Creative Writing11571251
LMArena Multi-Turn11901268
EQ-Bench Creative Writing717—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Granite 4.1 8b?

Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Haiku or Granite 4.1 8b better for coding?

Granite 4.1 8b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.1 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Granite 4.1 8b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.1 8b has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper