Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs GPT-5.2 Codex

GPT-5.2 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic

25.9

Rank #340 Confirmed

GPT-5.2 Codex OpenAI

42.6

Rank #111 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5.2 Codex leads 45.5 to 26.4.

Side by side

Claude 3 Haiku and GPT-5.2 Codex specifications
Claude 3 HaikuGPT-5.2 Codex
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Noometry Index25.942.6
Released2024-03-072025-12-18
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—400K
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.75
Output $ / M tokens—$14
Results tracked375

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.2 Codex leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 26.4 (#325), GPT-5.2 Codex: 45.5 (#71)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.2 Codex
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—72.8%
LMArena WebDev—1339
SWE-bench Multilingual—66.3%
WeirdML9.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct39.4%—
LMArena Coding1199—
BigCodeBench Complete50.1%—
CadEval12%—
ALE-Bench—1,300
HumanEval+68.9%—
MBPP+68.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: —, GPT-5.2 Codex: 41.0 (#22)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.2 Codex
Terminal-Bench—66.5%

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 16.3 (#307), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.2 Codex
Kagi LLM Benchmark34.2%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1174—
DTBench50.1%—
LMCA8.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.35—
ForecastBench53.2—
WinoGrande74.2%—

Math Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 9.8 (#319), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.2 Codex
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.8%—
LMArena Math1188—
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#285), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.2 Codex
GPQA Diamond36.3%—
Confabulations34.2%—
LMArena Expert1148—
MMLU73.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 23.6 (#128), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.2 Codex
LMArena Vision950—
ScienceQA72%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.0 (#243), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.2 Codex
LMArena Non-English1178—
LMArena Chinese1155—
LMArena French1195—
LMArena German1174—
LMArena Japanese1102—
LMArena Korean1109—
LMArena Russian1204—
LMArena Spanish1166—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 61.3 (#247), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.2 Codex
LMArena Instruction Following1173—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#237), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.2 Codex
LMArena Longer Query1190—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 29.7 (#291), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.2 Codex
LMArena Text1195—
LMArena Creative Writing1157—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing717—
LMArena Multi-Turn1190—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than GPT-5.2 Codex?

GPT-5.2 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Haiku or GPT-5.2 Codex better for coding?

GPT-5.2 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.5 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and GPT-5.2 Codex share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Codex has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper