Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs GPT-5.3 Chat

GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic

25.9

Rank #340 Confirmed

GPT-5.3 Chat OpenAI

42.8

Rank #109 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.3 Chat in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.3 Chat leads 63.1 to 29.7.

Side by side

Claude 3 Haiku and GPT-5.3 Chat specifications
Claude 3 HaikuGPT-5.3 Chat
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Noometry Index25.942.8
Released2024-03-072026-03-03
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—128K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.75
Output $ / M tokens—$14
Results tracked3718

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.3 Chat leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 26.4 (#325), GPT-5.3 Chat: 41.4 (#124)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.3 Chat
LMArena Coding11991408
WeirdML9.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct39.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete50.1%—
CadEval12%—
HumanEval+68.9%—
MBPP+68.8%—

Reasoning GPT-5.3 Chat leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 16.3 (#307), GPT-5.3 Chat: 28.5 (#102)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.3 Chat
LMArena Hard Prompts11741399
Kagi LLM Benchmark34.2%—
DTBench50.1%—
LMCA8.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.35—
ForecastBench53.2—
WinoGrande74.2%—

Math GPT-5.3 Chat leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 9.8 (#319), GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.2 (#142)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.3 Chat
LMArena Math11881389
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.8%—
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge GPT-5.3 Chat leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#285), GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.8 (#140)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.3 Chat
LMArena Expert11481397
GPQA Diamond36.3%—
Confabulations34.2%—
MMLU73.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 23.6 (#128), GPT-5.3 Chat: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.3 Chat
LMArena Vision950—
ScienceQA72%—

Multilingual GPT-5.3 Chat leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.0 (#243), GPT-5.3 Chat: 50.3 (#124)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.3 Chat
LMArena Non-English11781382
LMArena Chinese11551432
LMArena French11951397
LMArena German11741384
LMArena Japanese11021352
LMArena Korean11091346
LMArena Russian12041400
LMArena Spanish11661371

Instruction Following GPT-5.3 Chat leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 61.3 (#247), GPT-5.3 Chat: 72.8 (#129)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.3 Chat
LMArena Instruction Following11731378

Long Context GPT-5.3 Chat leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#237), GPT-5.3 Chat: 42.6 (#120)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.3 Chat
LMArena Longer Query11901396

Writing & Preference GPT-5.3 Chat leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 29.7 (#291), GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.1 (#68)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.3 Chat
LMArena Text11951389
LMArena Creative Writing11571355
EQ-Bench Creative Writing7171690
LMArena Multi-Turn11901412

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than GPT-5.3 Chat?

GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Haiku or GPT-5.3 Chat better for coding?

GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and GPT-5.3 Chat share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.3 Chat has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper