Model comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Llama 2-70B
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads 39.8 to 7.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 91.2% for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and 3.3% for Llama 2-70B.
- Llama 2-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Llama 2-70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 39.5 | 24.4 |
| Released | 2025-02-24 | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 58 | 35 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 40.6 (#136), Llama 2-70B: 31.4 (#286)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1079 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 61% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 52.8% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 64.9% | — |
| GSO | 3.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 74.5% | — |
| CadEval | 54% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 34.1 (#50), Llama 2-70B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 30.9% | — |
| Cybench | 20% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 43.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 35.8% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 60% | — |
Reasoning Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 18.6 (#277), Llama 2-70B: 14.4 (#325)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1333 | 1073 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.16 | 113.79 |
| ForecastBench | 61.8 | 51.4 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 46.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 28.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 4.2% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 87.8% | — |
| DTBench | — | 41.6% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 74% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 64.9% |
| CommonsenseQA 2.0 | — | 50% |
| HellaSwag | — | 85.3% |
| LAMBADA | — | 78.9% |
| LiveBench | 76.1% | — |
| PIQA | — | 82.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.2% |
Math Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 37.5 (#153), Llama 2-70B: 8.1 (#326)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 0% |
| LMArena Math | 1337 | 1091 |
| MATH Level 5 | 91.2% | 3.3% |
| Omni-MATH | 33% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 79% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.1% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 69.6% |
Knowledge Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 39.8 (#130), Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#310)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 79.7% | 26.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1321 | 1039 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.4% | — |
| Confabulations | 14.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.8% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 88.6% |
| MMLU | — | 69.9% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 60.2% |
| TriviaQA | — | 87.6% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.7 (#95), Llama 2-70B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1169 | — |
| GeoBench | 68% | — |
| VPCT | 39% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 33.9% | — |
Multilingual Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 44.1 (#179), Llama 2-70B: 27.7 (#274)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1296 | 1045 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1299 | 995 |
| LMArena French | 1303 | 1090 |
| LMArena German | 1301 | 1041 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1267 | 927 |
| LMArena Korean | 1249 | 964 |
| LMArena Russian | 1311 | 1083 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1298 | 1143 |
Instruction Following Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 72.9 (#125), Llama 2-70B: 54.9 (#278)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1071 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.3% | — |
| IFEval | 83.4% | — |
Long Context Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 50.3 (#10), Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#270)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1062 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |
Writing & Preference Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 54.4 (#150), Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#279)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1314 | 1115 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1332 | 1075 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1088 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 81.1% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1412 | — |
| WildBench | 81.4% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 59.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet better than Llama 2-70B?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Llama 2-70B better for coding?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Llama 2-70B share?
22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has 58 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-70B has 35.