Model comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Hunyuan Large Vision
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 2 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads 50.3 to 38.9.
Side by side
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Hunyuan Large Vision | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 39.5 | 37.6 |
| Released | 2025-02-24 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 58 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 40.6 (#136), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1308 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 61% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 52.8% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 64.9% | — |
| GSO | 3.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 74.5% | — |
| CadEval | 54% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 34.1 (#50), Hunyuan Large Vision: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 30.9% | — |
| Cybench | 20% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 43.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 35.8% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 60% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 18.6 (#277), Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1333 | 1257 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 46.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 28.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 4.2% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 87.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 74% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.16 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.8 | — |
| LiveBench | 76.1% | — |
Math Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 37.5 (#153), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1337 | 1268 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 33% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 79% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 91.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.1% | — |
Knowledge Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 39.8 (#130), Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1321 | 1252 |
| GPQA Diamond | 79.7% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.4% | — |
| Confabulations | 14.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.8% | — |
Multimodal Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.7 (#95), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1169 | 1180 |
| GeoBench | 68% | — |
| VPCT | 39% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 33.9% | — |
Multilingual Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 44.1 (#179), Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1296 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1299 | 1287 |
| LMArena Russian | 1311 | 1243 |
| LMArena French | 1303 | — |
| LMArena German | 1301 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1267 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1249 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1298 | — |
Instruction Following Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 72.9 (#125), Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1251 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.3% | — |
| IFEval | 83.4% | — |
Long Context Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 50.3 (#10), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1280 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |
Writing & Preference Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 54.4 (#150), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1314 | 1263 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1332 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1254 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 81.1% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1412 | — |
| WildBench | 81.4% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 59.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet better than Hunyuan Large Vision?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Hunyuan Large Vision share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has 58 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.