Model comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Hunyuan Large Vision
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads 32.9 to 24.8.
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Large Vision | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 39.7 | 37.6 |
| Released | 2025-12-01 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.58 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.68 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 40.4 (#140), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 46.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1308 |
Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.9 (#73), Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 52.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1257 |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1268 |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1252 |
Multimodal Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1287 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1243 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1251 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1280 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.0 (#222), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1248 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1276 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1254 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Hunyuan Large Vision?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Hunyuan Large Vision share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.