Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Claude 3.5 Sonnet has enough public results to be ranked (#225); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet Anthropic

34.4

Rank #225 Confirmed

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

42.1

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 51.4 to 39.5.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-6.1 Sol specifications
Claude 3.5 SonnetGPT-6.1 Sol
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Noometry Index34.442.1
Released2024-06-202026-09-29
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$10
Results tracked602

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.5 (#145), GPT-6.1 Sol: 51.4

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetGPT-6.1 Sol
DeepSWE—75.2%
Aider Polyglot51.6%—
GSO4.6%—
WeirdML40%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.8%—
LiveBench Coding67.1%—
LMArena Coding1343—
BigCodeBench Complete58.6%—
CadEval48%—
HumanEval+81.7%—
MBPP+74.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 32.1 (#61), GPT-6.1 Sol: 34.3

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetGPT-6.1 Sol
TheAgentCompany24%—
Cybench17.5%—
BALROG32.6%—
GDP.pdf—32%
METR Time Horizons45.2%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 22.5 (#176), GPT-6.1 Sol: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetGPT-6.1 Sol
SimpleBench41.4%—
EnigmaEval0.9%—
LiveBench Reasoning56.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1305—
DTBench67.8%—
LiveBench Data Analysis55%—
Epoch Capabilities Index133.55—
ForecastBench60.7—
LiveBench59%—

Math Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 18.0 (#282), GPT-6.1 Sol: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetGPT-6.1 Sol
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20258.5%—
Omni-MATH27.6%—
LiveBench Math52.3%—
LMArena Math1306—
MATH Level 556.9%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)2.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 28.5 (#236), GPT-6.1 Sol: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetGPT-6.1 Sol
GPQA Diamond55.3%—
Humanity's Last Exam4.1%—
MMLU-Pro77.7%—
Confabulations19.9%—
GPQA (HELM)56.5%—
LMArena Expert1264—
MMLU87.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 26.0 (#115), GPT-6.1 Sol: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Vision1125—
Video-MME60%—
GeoBench62%—
VPCT33%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 43.4 (#180), GPT-6.1 Sol: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Non-English1283—
LMArena Chinese1271—
LMArena French1304—
LMArena German1297—
LMArena Japanese1234—
LMArena Korean1200—
LMArena Russian1305—
LMArena Spanish1289—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 69.0 (#177), GPT-6.1 Sol: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetGPT-6.1 Sol
LiveBench Instruction Following69.3%—
IFEval85.5%—
LMArena Instruction Following1297—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.9 (#162), GPT-6.1 Sol: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Longer Query1311—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 53.0 (#159), GPT-6.1 Sol: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Text1298—
LMArena Creative Writing1292—
Short-Story Creative Writing80.3%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1451—
WildBench79.2%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1326—
LiveBench Language53.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet better than GPT-6.1 Sol?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet has enough public results to be ranked (#225); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet or GPT-6.1 Sol better for coding?

GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-6.1 Sol share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Sonnet has 60 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6.1 Sol has 2.

Related comparisons

Go deeper