Model comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs ERNIE 5.1
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 34.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
BaiduSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher in 1 category and ERNIE 5.1 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 37.5 to 18.0.
Side by side
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Baidu |
| Noometry Index | 34.4 | 43.1 |
| Released | 2024-06-20 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 60 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.5 (#145), ERNIE 5.1: 43.4 (#78)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1343 | 1488 |
| Aider Polyglot | 51.6% | — |
| GSO | 4.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 40% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 67.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58.6% | — |
| CadEval | 48% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 81.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 32.1 (#61), ERNIE 5.1: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 24% | — |
| Cybench | 17.5% | — |
| BALROG | 32.6% | — |
| LMArena Search | — | 1227 |
| METR Time Horizons | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 22.5 (#176), ERNIE 5.1: 20.9 (#209)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1305 | 1481 |
| SimpleBench | 41.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 23.4% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.9% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 56.7% | — |
| DTBench | 67.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 55% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.55 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.7 | — |
| LiveBench | 59% | — |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 18.0 (#282), ERNIE 5.1: 37.5 (#96)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1306 | 1481 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 8.5% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 27.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 52.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 56.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 2.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 28.5 (#236), ERNIE 5.1: 41.2 (#103)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1264 | 1491 |
| GPQA Diamond | 55.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 19.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 56.5% | — |
| MMLU | 87.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 26.0 (#115), ERNIE 5.1: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1125 | — |
| Video-MME | 60% | — |
| GeoBench | 62% | — |
| VPCT | 33% | — |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 43.4 (#180), ERNIE 5.1: 55.7 (#28)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1283 | 1455 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1271 | 1507 |
| LMArena French | 1304 | 1486 |
| LMArena German | 1297 | 1470 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1234 | 1422 |
| LMArena Korean | 1200 | 1428 |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | 1459 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1289 | 1472 |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 69.0 (#177), ERNIE 5.1: 76.9 (#35)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1460 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 69.3% | — |
| IFEval | 85.5% | — |
Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.9 (#162), ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#56)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1311 | 1462 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 53.0 (#159), ERNIE 5.1: 65.3 (#50)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1298 | 1468 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1292 | 1440 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1326 | 1471 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 80.3% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1451 | — |
| WildBench | 79.2% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 53.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet better than ERNIE 5.1?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 34.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet or ERNIE 5.1 better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Sonnet and ERNIE 5.1 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Sonnet has 60 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.1 has 19.