Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Yi-34B

Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.2 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic

29.2

Rank #315 Confirmed

Yi-34B 01.AI

27.8

Rank #329 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 6 categories and Yi-34B in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Claude 3.5 Haiku leads 18.7 to 7.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 46.4% for Claude 3.5 Haiku and 5.1% for Yi-34B.
  • Yi-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 HaikuYi-34B
ProviderAnthropic01.AI
Noometry Index29.227.8
Released2024-10-222023-11-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4923

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.9 (#265), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuYi-34B
LMArena Coding12861112
Aider Polyglot28%—
SciCode27.4%—
WeirdML30.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%—
LiveBench Coding51.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete59%—
CadEval32%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 28.0 (#95), Yi-34B: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuYi-34B
BALROG19.3%—

Reasoning Yi-34B leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.7 (#290), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuYi-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts12511104
Epoch Capabilities Index127.15117.39
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
DTBench56.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.5%—
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
LiveBench43.5%—

Math Yi-34B leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 14.7 (#300), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuYi-34B
LMArena Math12441114
MATH Level 546.4%5.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
Omni-MATH22.4%—
LiveBench Math35.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—
GSM8K—76%

Knowledge Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#281), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuYi-34B
GPQA Diamond38.1%14.7%
LMArena Expert12081061
MMLU74.3%76.3%
MMLU-Pro60.5%—
Confabulations36.7%—
GPQA (HELM)36.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.8 (#117), Yi-34B: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuYi-34B
LMArena Vision1092—
GeoBench34%—

Multilingual Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.0 (#218), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuYi-34B
LMArena Non-English12381079
LMArena Chinese12291176
LMArena French12641081
LMArena German12371042
LMArena Japanese1175993
LMArena Korean1173959
LMArena Russian12531050
LMArena Spanish12611070

Instruction Following Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 62.9 (#234), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuYi-34B
LMArena Instruction Following12411091
LiveBench Instruction Following61.9%—
IFEval79.2%—

Long Context Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#200), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuYi-34B
LMArena Longer Query12611094

Writing & Preference Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.7 (#234), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuYi-34B
LMArena Text12551129
LMArena Creative Writing12331108
LMArena Multi-Turn12651113
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1146—
WildBench76%—
LiveBench Language35.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than Yi-34B?

Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.2 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Yi-34B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (32.9 vs 32.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and Yi-34B share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper