Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Sonar

Sonar is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.5 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic

29.2

Rank #315 Confirmed

Sonar Perplexity

38.5

Rank #187 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Sonar in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Sonar leads 33.7 to 14.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Reasoning: 28.1% for Claude 3.5 Haiku and 46.3% for Sonar.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 Haiku and Sonar specifications
Claude 3.5 HaikuSonar
ProviderAnthropicPerplexity
Noometry Index29.238.5
Released2024-10-222024-01-01
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$1
Output $ / M tokens—$1
Results tracked497

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Sonar leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.9 (#265), Sonar: 35.7 (#221)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuSonar
LiveBench Coding51.4%35.1%
Aider Polyglot28%—
SciCode27.4%—
WeirdML30.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%—
LMArena Coding1286—
BigCodeBench Complete59%—
CadEval32%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 28.0 (#95), Sonar: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuSonar
BALROG19.3%—

Reasoning Sonar leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.7 (#290), Sonar: 21.1 (#227)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuSonar
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%46.3%
LiveBench Data Analysis48.5%37.9%
LiveBench43.5%46.9%
CritPt0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1251—
DTBench56.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.15—

Math Sonar leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 14.7 (#300), Sonar: 33.7 (#200)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuSonar
LiveBench Math35.5%41.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
Omni-MATH22.4%—
LMArena Math1244—
MATH Level 546.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#281), Sonar: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuSonar
GPQA Diamond38.1%—
MMLU-Pro60.5%—
Confabulations36.7%—
GPQA (HELM)36.3%—
LMArena Expert1208—
MMLU74.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.8 (#117), Sonar: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuSonar
LMArena Vision1092—
GeoBench34%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.0 (#218), Sonar: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuSonar
LMArena Non-English1238—
LMArena Chinese1229—
LMArena French1264—
LMArena German1237—
LMArena Japanese1175—
LMArena Korean1173—
LMArena Russian1253—
LMArena Spanish1261—

Instruction Following Sonar leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 62.9 (#234), Sonar: 71.4 (#150)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuSonar
LiveBench Instruction Following61.9%76.2%
IFEval79.2%—
LMArena Instruction Following1241—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#200), Sonar: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuSonar
LMArena Longer Query1261—

Writing & Preference Sonar leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.7 (#234), Sonar: 52.6 (#167)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuSonar
LiveBench Language35.4%44.1%
LMArena Text1255—
LMArena Creative Writing1233—
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1146—
WildBench76%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1265—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than Sonar?

Sonar is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.5 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Sonar better for coding?

Sonar scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.7 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and Sonar share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and Sonar has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper