Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-5.1-Codex

GPT-5.1-Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.2 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic

28.9

Rank #309 Confirmed

GPT-5.1-Codex OpenAI

38.2

Rank #178 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.1-Codex leads 29.3 to 13.7.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-5.1-Codex specifications
Claude 3.5 HaikuGPT-5.1-Codex
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Noometry Index28.938.2
Released2024-10-222025-11-12
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—400K
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$10
Results tracked496

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.1-Codex leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.6 (#258), GPT-5.1-Codex: 41.7 (#107)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGPT-5.1-Codex
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—66%
Aider Polyglot28%—
LMArena WebDev—1337
SciCode27.4%—
WeirdML30.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%—
LiveBench Coding51.4%—
LMArena Coding1287—
BigCodeBench Complete59%—
CadEval32%—
ALE-Bench—1,245

Agentic & Tool Use GPT-5.1-Codex leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 27.7 (#90), GPT-5.1-Codex: 37.8 (#32)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGPT-5.1-Codex
Terminal-Bench—60.4%
BALROG19.3%—
METR Time Horizons—70.8%

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.1 (#286), GPT-5.1-Codex: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGPT-5.1-Codex
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1251—
DTBench56.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.15—
LiveBench43.5%—

Math GPT-5.1-Codex leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 13.7 (#294), GPT-5.1-Codex: 29.3 (#218)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGPT-5.1-Codex
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
ProofBench—9%
Omni-MATH22.4%—
LiveBench Math35.5%—
LMArena Math1244—
MATH Level 546.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#276), GPT-5.1-Codex: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGPT-5.1-Codex
GPQA Diamond38.1%—
MMLU-Pro60.5%—
Confabulations36.7%—
GPQA (HELM)36.3%—
LMArena Expert1208—
MMLU74.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.3 (#113), GPT-5.1-Codex: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGPT-5.1-Codex
LMArena Vision1092—
GeoBench34%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.2 (#213), GPT-5.1-Codex: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGPT-5.1-Codex
LMArena Non-English1238—
LMArena Chinese1229—
LMArena French1262—
LMArena German1237—
LMArena Japanese1175—
LMArena Korean1172—
LMArena Russian1253—
LMArena Spanish1261—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 63.1 (#229), GPT-5.1-Codex: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGPT-5.1-Codex
LiveBench Instruction Following61.9%—
IFEval79.2%—
LMArena Instruction Following1241—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#195), GPT-5.1-Codex: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGPT-5.1-Codex
LMArena Longer Query1261—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.9 (#228), GPT-5.1-Codex: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGPT-5.1-Codex
LMArena Text1255—
LMArena Creative Writing1233—
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1146—
WildBench76%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1265—
LiveBench Language35.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than GPT-5.1-Codex?

GPT-5.1-Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.2 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or GPT-5.1-Codex better for coding?

GPT-5.1-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.7 versus 32.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-5.1-Codex share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.1-Codex has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper