Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Phi-4 Mini

Phi-4 Mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.9 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic

29.2

Rank #315 Confirmed

Phi-4 Mini Microsoft

30.9

Rank #283 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 1 category and Phi-4 Mini in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Phi-4 Mini leads 25.3 to 18.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 27.4% for Claude 3.5 Haiku and 10.8% for Phi-4 Mini.
  • Phi-4 Mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 HaikuPhi-4 Mini
ProviderAnthropicMicrosoft
Noometry Index29.230.9
Released2024-10-222024-12-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.075
Output $ / M tokens—$0.30
Results tracked493

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.9 (#265), Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-4 Mini
SciCode27.4%10.8%
Aider Polyglot28%—
WeirdML30.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%—
LiveBench Coding51.4%—
LMArena Coding1286—
BigCodeBench Complete59%—
CadEval32%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 28.0 (#95), Phi-4 Mini: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-4 Mini
BALROG19.3%—

Reasoning Phi-4 Mini leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.7 (#290), Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-4 Mini
CritPt0%0%
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1251—
DTBench56.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.15—
LiveBench43.5%—

Math Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 14.7 (#300), Phi-4 Mini: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-4 Mini
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
Omni-MATH22.4%—
LiveBench Math35.5%—
LMArena Math1244—
MATH Level 546.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge Phi-4 Mini leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#281), Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-4 Mini
GPQA Diamond38.1%—
MMLU-Pro60.5%—
Confabulations36.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—23.5%
GPQA (HELM)36.3%—
LMArena Expert1208—
MMLU74.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.8 (#117), Phi-4 Mini: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-4 Mini
LMArena Vision1092—
GeoBench34%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.0 (#218), Phi-4 Mini: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-4 Mini
LMArena Non-English1238—
LMArena Chinese1229—
LMArena French1264—
LMArena German1237—
LMArena Japanese1175—
LMArena Korean1173—
LMArena Russian1253—
LMArena Spanish1261—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 62.9 (#234), Phi-4 Mini: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-4 Mini
LiveBench Instruction Following61.9%—
IFEval79.2%—
LMArena Instruction Following1241—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#200), Phi-4 Mini: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-4 Mini
LMArena Longer Query1261—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.7 (#234), Phi-4 Mini: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-4 Mini
LMArena Text1255—
LMArena Creative Writing1233—
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1146—
WildBench76%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1265—
LiveBench Language35.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than Phi-4 Mini?

Phi-4 Mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.9 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and Phi-4 Mini share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper