Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Phi-4 Mini
Phi-4 Mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Phi-4 Mini leads 21.7 to 18.2.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi-4 Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 30.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-12-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.075 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294), Phi-4 Mini: 27.6 (#312)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 10.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Phi-4 Mini leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268), Phi-4 Mini: 21.7 (#190)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | — |
Knowledge Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255), Phi-4 Mini: 24.8 (#261)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | — |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Phi-4 Mini?
Phi-4 Mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?
Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.6 versus 27.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Phi-4 Mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.