Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Phi-3.5-mini

Claude 3.5 Haiku has enough public results to be ranked (#315); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic

29.2

Rank #315 Confirmed

Phi-3.5-mini Microsoft

36.9

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Phi-3.5-mini in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 59% for Claude 3.5 Haiku and 38.5% for Phi-3.5-mini.
  • Phi-3.5-mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 HaikuPhi-3.5-mini
ProviderAnthropicMicrosoft
Noometry Index29.236.9
Released2024-10-222024-08-16
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked495

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Phi-3.5-mini leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.9 (#265), Phi-3.5-mini: 34.6 (#232)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-3.5-mini
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%32.8%
BigCodeBench Complete59%38.5%
Aider Polyglot28%—
SciCode27.4%—
WeirdML30.7%—
LiveBench Coding51.4%—
LMArena Coding1286—
CadEval32%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 28.0 (#95), Phi-3.5-mini: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-3.5-mini
BALROG19.3%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.7 (#290), Phi-3.5-mini: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-3.5-mini
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1251—
DTBench56.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.15—
LiveBench43.5%—
PIQA—81%

Math Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 14.7 (#300), Phi-3.5-mini: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-3.5-mini
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
Omni-MATH22.4%—
LiveBench Math35.5%—
LMArena Math1244—
MATH Level 546.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—
GSM8K—86.2%

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#281), Phi-3.5-mini: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-3.5-mini
GPQA Diamond38.1%—
MMLU-Pro60.5%—
Confabulations36.7%—
GPQA (HELM)36.3%—
LMArena Expert1208—
BoolQ—78%
MMLU74.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.8 (#117), Phi-3.5-mini: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-3.5-mini
LMArena Vision1092—
GeoBench34%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.0 (#218), Phi-3.5-mini: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-3.5-mini
LMArena Non-English1238—
LMArena Chinese1229—
LMArena French1264—
LMArena German1237—
LMArena Japanese1175—
LMArena Korean1173—
LMArena Russian1253—
LMArena Spanish1261—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 62.9 (#234), Phi-3.5-mini: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-3.5-mini
LiveBench Instruction Following61.9%—
IFEval79.2%—
LMArena Instruction Following1241—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#200), Phi-3.5-mini: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-3.5-mini
LMArena Longer Query1261—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.7 (#234), Phi-3.5-mini: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-3.5-mini
LMArena Text1255—
LMArena Creative Writing1233—
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1146—
WildBench76%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1265—
LiveBench Language35.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than Phi-3.5-mini?

Claude 3.5 Haiku has enough public results to be ranked (#315); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Phi-3.5-mini better for coding?

Phi-3.5-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and Phi-3.5-mini share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-mini has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper