Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Phi-3.5-mini
Gemma 1.1 2b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#313); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Phi-3.5-mini leads 34.6 to 30.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi-3.5-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 36.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-08-16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Phi-3.5-mini leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Phi-3.5-mini: 34.6 (#232)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 38.5% |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
| PIQA | — | 81% |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 78% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | — |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Phi-3.5-mini?
Gemma 1.1 2b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#313); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Phi-3.5-mini better for coding?
Phi-3.5-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Phi-3.5-mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-mini has 5.