Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Phi-2

Claude 3.5 Haiku has enough public results to be ranked (#315); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic

29.2

Rank #315 Confirmed

Phi-2 Microsoft

—

Unranked

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both.
  • Phi-2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 HaikuPhi-2
ProviderAnthropicMicrosoft
Noometry Index29.2—
Released2024-10-222023-12-12
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4911

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.9 (#265), Phi-2: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-2
Aider Polyglot28%—
SciCode27.4%—
WeirdML30.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%—
LiveBench Coding51.4%—
LMArena Coding1286—
BigCodeBench Complete59%—
CadEval32%—
HumanEval+—45.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 28.0 (#95), Phi-2: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-2
BALROG19.3%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.7 (#290), Phi-2: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-2
Epoch Capabilities Index127.15107.94
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1251—
DTBench56.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.5%—
Adversarial NLI—42.5%
BIG-Bench Hard—59.4%
HellaSwag—53.6%
LiveBench43.5%—
WinoGrande—54.7%

Math Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 14.7 (#300), Phi-2: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-2
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
Omni-MATH22.4%—
LiveBench Math35.5%—
LMArena Math1244—
MATH Level 546.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#281), Phi-2: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-2
MMLU74.3%58.4%
GPQA Diamond38.1%—
MMLU-Pro60.5%—
Confabulations36.7%—
GPQA (HELM)36.3%—
LMArena Expert1208—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—75.9%
OpenBookQA—73.6%
TriviaQA—45.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.8 (#117), Phi-2: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-2
LMArena Vision1092—
GeoBench34%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.0 (#218), Phi-2: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-2
LMArena Non-English1238—
LMArena Chinese1229—
LMArena French1264—
LMArena German1237—
LMArena Japanese1175—
LMArena Korean1173—
LMArena Russian1253—
LMArena Spanish1261—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 62.9 (#234), Phi-2: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-2
LiveBench Instruction Following61.9%—
IFEval79.2%—
LMArena Instruction Following1241—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#200), Phi-2: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-2
LMArena Longer Query1261—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.7 (#234), Phi-2: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuPhi-2
LMArena Text1255—
LMArena Creative Writing1233—
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1146—
WildBench76%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1265—
LiveBench Language35.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than Phi-2?

Claude 3.5 Haiku has enough public results to be ranked (#315); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and Phi-2 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and Phi-2 has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper