Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Phi-2
Gemma 1.1 2b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#313); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | — |
| Released | — | 2023-12-12 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | 45.1% |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | 54.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 42.5% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 59.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 107.94 |
| HellaSwag | — | 53.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 54.7% |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 75.9% |
| MMLU | — | 58.4% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 73.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 45.2% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | — |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Phi-2?
Gemma 1.1 2b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#313); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Phi-2 share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Phi-2 has 11.