Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs MiMo-V2-Omni

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic

29.2

Rank #315 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi

43.6

Rank #88 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 39.1 to 14.7.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2-Omni
ProviderAnthropicXiaomi
Noometry Index29.243.6
Released2024-10-222026-03-18
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked4918

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.9 (#265), MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Coding12861466
Aider Polyglot28%—
SciCode27.4%—
WeirdML30.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%—
LiveBench Coding51.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete59%—
CadEval32%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 28.0 (#95), MiMo-V2-Omni: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2-Omni
BALROG19.3%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.7 (#290), MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Hard Prompts12511445
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
DTBench56.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.15—
LiveBench43.5%—

Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 14.7 (#300), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Math12441430
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
Omni-MATH22.4%—
LiveBench Math35.5%—
MATH Level 546.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#281), MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Expert12081449
GPQA Diamond38.1%—
MMLU-Pro60.5%—
Confabulations36.7%—
GPQA (HELM)36.3%—
MMLU74.3%—

Multimodal MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.8 (#117), MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Vision10921228
GeoBench34%—

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.0 (#218), MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Non-English12381404
LMArena Chinese12291465
LMArena French12641447
LMArena German12371399
LMArena Japanese11751317
LMArena Korean11731355
LMArena Russian12531412
LMArena Spanish12611434

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 62.9 (#234), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Instruction Following12411428
LiveBench Instruction Following61.9%—
IFEval79.2%—

Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#200), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Longer Query12611442

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.7 (#234), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Text12551423
LMArena Creative Writing12331392
LMArena Multi-Turn12651445
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1146—
WildBench76%—
LiveBench Language35.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper