Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic

28.9

Rank #309 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

44.4

Rank #74 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 37.4 to 13.7.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderAnthropicXiaomi
Noometry Index28.944.4
Released2024-10-222026-09-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked4913

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.6 (#258), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Coding12871516
Aider Polyglot28%—
SciCode27.4%—
WeirdML30.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%—
LiveBench Coding51.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete59%—
CadEval32%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 27.7 (#90), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Flash
BALROG19.3%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.1 (#286), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts12511481
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
DTBench56.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.15—
LiveBench43.5%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 13.7 (#294), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Math12441477
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
Omni-MATH22.4%—
LiveBench Math35.5%—
MATH Level 546.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#276), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Expert12081516
GPQA Diamond38.1%—
MMLU-Pro60.5%—
Confabulations36.7%—
GPQA (HELM)36.3%—
MMLU74.3%—

Multimodal MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.3 (#113), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision10921266
GeoBench34%—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.2 (#213), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English12381439
LMArena Chinese12291501
LMArena Russian12531424
LMArena French1262—
LMArena German1237—
LMArena Japanese1175—
LMArena Korean1172—
LMArena Spanish1261—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 63.1 (#229), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following12411463
LiveBench Instruction Following61.9%—
IFEval79.2%—

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#195), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query12611465

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.9 (#228), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text12551459
LMArena Creative Writing12331408
LMArena Multi-Turn12651460
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1146—
WildBench76%—
LiveBench Language35.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 32.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper