Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs MiMo-V2.5

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic

29.2

Rank #315 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.5 Xiaomi

43.4

Rank #93 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 40.8 to 18.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 27.4% for Claude 3.5 Haiku and 43.1% for MiMo-V2.5.
  • MiMo-V2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2.5
ProviderAnthropicXiaomi
Noometry Index29.243.4
Released2024-10-222026-04-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked4923

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.9 (#265), MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2.5
SciCode27.4%43.1%
LMArena Coding12861469
Aider Polyglot28%—
LMArena WebDev—1438
WeirdML30.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%—
LiveBench Coding51.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete59%—
CadEval32%—
ALE-Bench—513.95

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 28.0 (#95), MiMo-V2.5: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2.5
BALROG19.3%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.7 (#290), MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2.5
CritPt0%3.7%
LMArena Hard Prompts12511450
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
DTBench56.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.15—
LiveBench43.5%—

Math MiMo-V2.5 leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 14.7 (#300), MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Math12441436
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
ProofBench—16%
Omni-MATH22.4%—
LiveBench Math35.5%—
MATH Level 546.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#281), MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Expert12081460
GPQA Diamond38.1%—
MMLU-Pro60.5%—
Confabulations36.7%—
GPQA (HELM)36.3%—
MMLU74.3%—

Multimodal MiMo-V2.5 leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.8 (#117), MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision10921247
GeoBench34%—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5 leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.0 (#218), MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Non-English12381404
LMArena Chinese12291468
LMArena French12641447
LMArena German12371421
LMArena Japanese11751306
LMArena Korean11731363
LMArena Russian12531395
LMArena Spanish12611416

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 62.9 (#234), MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Instruction Following12411434
LiveBench Instruction Following61.9%—
IFEval79.2%—

Long Context MiMo-V2.5 leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#200), MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Longer Query12611445

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.7 (#234), MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text12551428
LMArena Creative Writing12331393
LMArena Multi-Turn12651445
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1146—
WildBench76%—
LiveBench Language35.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and MiMo-V2.5 share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper