Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic

29.2

Rank #315 Confirmed

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 Alibaba (Qwen)

38.8

Rank #181 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 36.1 to 14.7.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 HaikuQwen2.5 Plus 1127
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.238.8
Released2024-10-22—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4914

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.9 (#265), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Coding12861314
Aider Polyglot28%—
SciCode27.4%—
WeirdML30.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%—
LiveBench Coding51.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete59%—
CadEval32%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 28.0 (#95), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen2.5 Plus 1127
BALROG19.3%—

Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.7 (#290), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Hard Prompts12511299
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
DTBench56.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.15—
LiveBench43.5%—

Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 14.7 (#300), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Math12441298
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
Omni-MATH22.4%—
LiveBench Math35.5%—
MATH Level 546.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#281), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Expert12081289
GPQA Diamond38.1%—
MMLU-Pro60.5%—
Confabulations36.7%—
GPQA (HELM)36.3%—
MMLU74.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.8 (#117), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Vision1092—
GeoBench34%—

Multilingual Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.0 (#218), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Non-English12381265
LMArena Chinese12291314
LMArena German12371231
LMArena Japanese11751207
LMArena Russian12531271
LMArena French1264—
LMArena Korean1173—
LMArena Spanish1261—

Instruction Following Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 62.9 (#234), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Instruction Following12411275
LiveBench Instruction Following61.9%—
IFEval79.2%—

Long Context Too close to call

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#200), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Longer Query12611292

Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.7 (#234), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Text12551299
LMArena Creative Writing12331262
LMArena Multi-Turn12651299
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1146—
WildBench76%—
LiveBench Language35.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper